Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Herman LeFors, Jr. v. Dan Langston, et al
as 15-2131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Herman H. LeFors, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Dan Langston, Sheriff, Greene County Arkansas, Colin P. Wall, Attorney, Rainwater, Holt and Sexton, PA, Steven M. Blanchard, Dr., Physician for Greene County Jail and others
Dixon v. Carter et al
as 3:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Vernon Wesley Dixon
Defendant:
David Carter, Allison Huckabee, Sammie Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huffins v. Greene County Jail et al
as 3:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Huffins
Defendant:
Greene County Jail and Sammy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeFors v. Langston et al
as 3:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Herman H LeFors, Jr
Defendant:
Dan Langston, Colin P Wall, Steven M Blanchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LeFors v. Langston et al
as 3:2014cv00138
Plaintiff:
Herman H LeFors, Jr
Defendant:
Dan Langston , John Calley , Ray Brandon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Soto v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 14-1119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Shawn Soto
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry D. May, Assistant Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Grant Harris, Assistant Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Lamar v. Cawley et al
as 3:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lamar
Defendant:
John Cawley, Sammie Johnson and Tyler Ivie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Johnson et al
as 3:2013cv00162
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Pullen, Jr
Defendant:
Sammie Johnson, Blaine Cagle and John Cawley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2010cv00220
Plaintiff:
James Edward Smith
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry May, Curtis Meinzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2010cv00212
Plaintiff:
Robert Soto
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Larry D May, Grant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
