Cases 1 - 10 of 35,671
United States of America v. $50,821.04 seized from Associated Bank account No. 2283264485, in the name of Midwest Publishers Home Office Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv02487
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$50,821.04 seized from Associated Bank account No. 2283264485, in the name of Midwest Publishers Home Office Inc., $30,722.30 seized from Associated Bank account No. 2283264493, in the name of Midwest Publishers Home Office Inc. doing business as Bee Marketing, $48,000 from Associated Bank cashiers check 20067406763 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Ajai v. North Dakota Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Sarai Hannah Ajai
Defendant:
North Dakota Department of Transportation and United States Postal Service, The
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
United States v. Abigail Knight
as 24-2309
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Abigail Margarete Knight
United States of America v. Wilson
as 6:2024cv03125
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ken Kenyatta Wilson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
United States v. Saddam Samaan
as 24-2319
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Saddam Daoud Samaan
United States v. Marcus Medina
as 24-2321
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Marcus Medina
United States v. Muhammad Arif
as 24-2323
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Muhammad Arif
United States v. Phillip Cutler
as 24-2324
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Phillip J. Cutler
United States v. Robert Sharp
as 24-2317
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Carl Sharp
Julyen Martin v. United States
as 24-2320
Petitioner:
Julyen Alonzo Martin
Respondent:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
