Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Loyer v. Spearman
as 2:2018cv00210
Plaintiff:
Clifford C. Loyer
Respondent:
Marlon Spearman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Kaul et al.
as 2:2016cv02784
Plaintiff:
Clifford Brent Thomas
Defendant:
K. Kaul and Ladan Hashemi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venson v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 2:2016cv02525
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Venson
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services, J. Lewis and R. Steven Tharratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Tilburg v. Seibel
as 2:2016cv01688
Petitioner:
Clifford John Van Tilburg
Respondent:
Kimberly A. Seibel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poarch v. Clifford et al
as 2:2015cv02363
Plaintiff:
Gregory Roosevelt Poarch
Defendant:
Clifford, William and Felix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. California Board of Parole Hearings
as 2:2015cv00609
Petitioner:
Johnny Clifford Jackson
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chavarria et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2015cv00223
Defendant:
Edmond G. Brown, Jr., Jeffrey A. Beard, Matthew Cate and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Chavarria , Ramon Y. Landin , Raymond A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavarria et al v. Brown et al
as 1:2015at00099
Defendant:
Edmond G. Brown, Jr., Jeffrey A. Beard, Matthew Cate and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Chavarria , Ramon Y. Landin, Clifford B. Chaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bates et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2014at00965
Plaintiff:
Eric Bates , Paul Blevins , Michael Blue and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2014cv02085
Plaintiff:
Eric Bates , Paul Blevins , Michael Blue and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.