Cases 211 - 220 of 3,062
Jonathan Riches v. Stephen Dewalt
as 10-5933
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden
Jonathan Riches v. Creative Artists Agency
as 10-2714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant - Appellee:
Creative Artists Agency
Jonathan Riches v. Officer Howe, et al
as 10-40740
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, also known as Faisal Shahzad
Respondent - Appellee:
OFFICER HOWE, AMANDA HUGHES and RESIDENTIAL DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM
Bernard Madoff v. Umar Abdulmutallab, et al
as 10-5922
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BERNARD L. MADOFF
Defendant:
UMAR FAROUK ABDULMUTALLAB
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Riches et al v. Hungness et al
as 2:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Richard Gulietti, Daniel Anthony Weymouth and others
Defendant:
Kristen Hungness, Amanda Hughes, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Bernard Madoff, et al v. Joe Arpaio, et al
as 10-16664
Plaintiff:
BERNARD MADOFF and JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK J. SIMPSON and DANIEL ANTHONY WEYMOUTH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ARPAIO, Maricopa County Sheriff, IRVING H. PICARD, FRANK DIPASCAL and others
Jonathan Riches v. Stephen Dewalt
as 10-5918
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
STEPHEN DEWALT, Warden
Jonathan Riches v. Field & Stream Magazine, et al
as 10-5910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
FIELD & STREAM MAGAZINE, et. al.
Jonathan Riches v. Amanda Hughes, et al
as 10-5919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
AMANDA HUGHES, RDAP Drug Treatment Specialist and HEIDI MONTAG, aka Heather Montag
Computer Consulting & Network v. Universal Service Adminiatrati
as 10-5907
Plaintiff:
COMPUTER CONSULTING & NETWORK DESIGN, INC.
Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNIVERSAL SERVICE ADMINIATRATIVE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
