Cases 41 - 50 of 174
Allah v Washington State Penitentiary et al
as 2:2018cv01303
Defendant:
Alex Gonzalez, Dean Davis, Heidi L. Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Allah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Detrick Conerly, et al v. Ada County, et al
as 18-35719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DETRICK CURTIS CONERLY, AKA Detrick Conerly, MICHAEL AARON BONNER, MICHAEL GRIFFITH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ADA COUNTY, CANYON COUNTY, IDOC and others
Christopher Griffith v. Randy Blade
as 18-35643
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER D. GRIFFITH
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY BLADES, Warden
Sasaki v. Inch et al
as 1:2018cv00270
Defendant:
David J. Bruce, Walter Williams, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
Terence Sasaki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Michael et al
as 6:2018cv00060
Plaintiff:
Eugene Ford
Defendant:
Reginald Michael, Mike Batista, Mike Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monts #165150 v. Bowen et al
as 2:2018cv00754
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Monts
Defendant:
Aaron Bowen, Shanda Sue Payne, Dave Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conerly et al v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
Detrick Curtis Conerly and Michael Griffith
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Ada County, Valley County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner et al v. Ada County et al
as 1:2018cv00058
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Bonner, Detrick Curtis Conerly, Michael Griffith and others
Defendant:
Ada County, Canyon County, IDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardney v. Griffith et al
as 2:2017cv02462
Plaintiff:
John Hardney
Defendant:
T. Griffith, J. Gold, M. Rhoades and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffith et al v. State of Idaho et al
as 3:2017cv05708
Plaintiff:
Michael Griffith, Detrick Curtis Conerly, Michael Aaron Bonner and others
Defendant:
State of Idaho and Paran LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
