Cases 111 - 120 of 1,549
Holtz et al v. China Green Agriculture, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07076
Plaintiff:
James Holtz and Rick Sherman
Defendant:
China Green Agriculture, Inc., Tao Li, Yongcheng Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Securities Fraud
Tron v. Robertson et al
as 3:2022cv08634
Plaintiff:
Sergio Tron
Defendant:
Ian Robertson, Ken Manget, Alex Rodrigues and others
Manning v. Embark Technology Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07526
Plaintiff:
Mr Robert Manning, II and Robert Manning, II
Defendant:
Embark Technology Inc., Ian Robertson, Ken Manget and others
Alan Kalin v. Semper Midas Fund, Ltd., et al
as 22-16766
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN B. KALIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SEMPER MIDAS FUND, LTD., GREGORY A. PARSONS, DAVID BREE and others
Paramount Investments Corp Limited v. Martin et al
as 3:2022cv01615
Plaintiff:
Paramount Investments Corp Limited
Defendant:
James Martin and Copa di Vino Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
National Center for Public Policy Research v. Schultz et al
as 2:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
National Center for Public Policy Research
Defendant:
Howard Schultz, Starbucks Corporation, Kevin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Edelman v. Goldberg et al
as 4:2022cv05379
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Edelman
Defendant:
Michael D. Goldberg, Reginald Seeto, George Bickerstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits
Luberisse v. Robertson et al
as 3:2022cv05455
Plaintiff:
Josh Luberisse and Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II
Defendant:
Ian Robertson, Ken Manget, Alex Rodrigues and others
Lehmann v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv05269
Plaintiff:
Mindy Lehmann
Defendant:
Netflix, Inc., Richard N. Barton, Rodolphe Belmer and others
Hany Morsy v. David Michery et al
as 2:2022cv07139
Plaintiff:
Hany Morsy
Defendant:
David Michery, Ignacio Novoa, Mary Winter and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
