Cases 1 - 10 of 26
In re: Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
as 3:2023md03084
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe LSA 340, Katherine Hylin, E. R. and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC, Raiser-CA, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Bret Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
F-3 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03951
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe F-3
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jane Doe F-2 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03949
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe F-2
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
F-1 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03945
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe F-1
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Foy v. Vinson et al
as 2:2021cv02076
Plaintiff:
Michael F Foy, IV
Defendant:
Jennifer Vinson and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mary F.Hannan v. Lillian A. Korber et al
as 8:2020cv02144
Defendant:
Kerry L. Korber, Justin S. Korber, Timothy E. Korber and others
Plaintiff:
Mary F. Hannan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snyder v. Stevens
as 2:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
James F. Snyder
Defendant:
Clayton Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Oshima v. Bennet, et al
as 3:2016cv05451
Plaintiff:
Yasuhito Brandon Oshima
Defendant:
John F. Bennet and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neuman v. Herman
as 1:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
David Alexander Neuman
Defendant:
Jeffrey Marc Herman, Herman Law Firm, P. A., Mark F. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Egan v. Singer
as 1:2014cv00177
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Egan, III
Defendant:
Bryan Jay Singer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
