Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Thatcher et al v. BAF Transport Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv05444
Plaintiff:
Larry Thatcher and Karen Thatcher
Defendant:
BAF Transport Inc., En K. Khai, Pat Doe Khai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Johnstone v. Lohmann
as 2:2023cv00703
Plaintiff:
Karen Johnstone
Defendant:
George Lohmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gregory Burke et al v. Kingston Mikhail Lindner et al
as 8:2022cv01609
Plaintiff:
Gregory Burke and Alexis Burke
Defendant:
Kingston Mikhail Lindner, Jonathan Lindner, Karen Lindner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lappi v. Burrows et al
as 4:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Karen E. Lappi
Defendant:
Richard Allen Burrows and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Conway v. Pendergrass et al
as 2:2021cv00226
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Karen Conway and Karen Conway
Defendant:
Dawson Pendergrass, United States of America, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Martin et al v. Hannu et al
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
John Doe Driver 2, Joel Hannu, Baljinder Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Karen Martin and Shawn Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Elizabeth D. Sy et al v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2020cv01241
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Does 1-50 and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth D. Sy and Karen Jeane D. Sy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Torres v. Sacs Furniture
as 2:2017cv02758
Defendant:
Jared Law and Sacs Furniture, LLC
Plaintiff:
Karen Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hidalgo et al v. Avagyan et al
as 2:2017cv00825
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Hidalgo , Arminda Otero Rabago and Leonel Guadalupe Pena Otero
Defendant:
Karen Avagyan , Unknown Avagyan and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trotter v. Tredick
as 2:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
Misha Trotter
Defendant:
Karen D. Tredick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
