Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Complot v. Goldman Sachs Bank USA
as 2:2023cv02384
Plaintiff:
Oliver Complot
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Bank USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Cann v. Nordstrom Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
D'voreaux Cann
Defendant:
Nordstrom Inc, TD Bank USA NA and Nordstrom Card Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Fuentes v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.,
as 3:2022cv00916
Plaintiff:
Mark A Fuentes
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Danzy v. MDG USA Inc.
as 3:2022cv01923
Plaintiff:
Tyisha Danzy
Defendant:
MDG USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Rivo Holdings LLC v. KiwiJet, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00974
Defendant:
KiwiJet, LLC, Does 2 through 25, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Rivo Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 la
Corp. Realty USA, LLC v. Sunny Acre, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv07243
Plaintiff:
Corp. Realty USA, LLC
Defendant:
Sunny Acre LLC and Tasu LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Clark
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Defendant:
James E. Clark
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Faith Brashear v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al
as 5:2016cv02515
Plaintiff:
Faith Brashear
Defendant:
Does, HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Clark v. Capital Income and Growth Fund, LLC, et al.
as 1:2015cv01479
Plaintiff:
Bernard Clark
Defendant:
Capital Income and Growth Fund, LLC, Chase Bank USA, N.A., Mortgage Pointe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Clark v. Capital Income and Growth Fund, LLC, et al.
as 2:2015cv01171
Plaintiff:
Bernard Clark
Defendant:
Capital Income and Growth Fund, LLC, Chase Bank USA, N.A., Mortgage Pointe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
