Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lee v. Segura
as 5:2024cv03278
Plaintiff:
Jimmie K. Lee
Defendant:
Jose Segura
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graven v. Snow et al
as 2:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
William A Graven
Defendant:
G Murray Snow, Mary H Murguia, John C Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. City of San Jose
as 5:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Jimmy K Lee
Defendant:
City of San Jose and Michael Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ohana Control Systems, Inc., et al v. City & County of Honolulu, et al
as 22-15956
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OHANA CONTROL SYSTEMS, INC. and MICHAEL AMIR BOROCHOV
Defendant:
CITY & COUNTY OF HONOLULU, WAYNE K. MASUDA and SHELDON YASSO
Defendant / Appellant:
TIM CAIRES, JEFFREY K. LEE and DAVID MALONE
Ohana Control Systems, Inc. et al v. City & County of Honolulu et al
as 1:2021cv00345
Plaintiff:
Ohana Control Systems, Inc. and Michael Amir Borochov
Defendant:
City & County of Honolulu, Wayne K. Masuda, Sheldon Yasso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. Winborn et al
as 3:2017cv06065
Plaintiff:
Judy K Lee
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Winborn and Clallam County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Security People, Inc. v. Lee et al
as 3:2015cv03172
Plaintiff:
Security People, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle K. Lee, United States Patent and Trademark Office and Ojmar US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ronald Sims v. Officer K. Lee, et al
as 13-56820
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD WESLEY SIMS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. LEE, Officer, No. 17046, official capacity, KRUGER TOW, DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL and others
Ronald Wesley Sims v. K Lee et al
as 2:2013cv01548
Defendant:
Department of California Highway Patrol, Kruger Tow, K Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wesley Sims
Ronald Sims v. K Lee et al
as 2:2013cv00072
Defendant:
Department of California Highway Patrol, Kruger Tow, Officer K Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sims
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
