Cases 151 - 160 of 18,742
(HC) Arauza v. USA (2255- (2:18-cr-00202)
as 2:2023cv02263
Petitioner:
Gabriel Vicente Arauza
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. USA
as 4:2023cv00410
Petitioner:
Darrin Jermaine Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. USA
as 4:2023cv00437
Petitioner:
Koreasa Maria Williams and Koreasa M Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bowie v. USA
as 3:2023cv01451
Petitioner:
James Michael Bowie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wood v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01522
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Wood
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jurijus Kadamovas v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv08289
Petitioner:
Jurijus Kadamovas
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bomber v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv01491
Petitioner:
Jamaal Johnathan Bomber
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Flucas v. USA
as 2:2023cv02164
Petitioner:
Rodney Flucas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Du Truong Nguyen v. United States of America et al
as 8:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America, Otis D. Wright II, Stephen V. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Franklin v. USA
as 6:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Kielan Brett Franklin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
