Cases 21 - 30 of 94,892
Gotschall v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Robert Gotschall
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Perkins
as 4:2024cv05058
Petitioner:
Dakota Edward Stevens
Respondent:
Jeffrey Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05459
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones #347223 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01394
Petitioner:
LC Jones, III
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kubica v. Lundy
as 2:2024cv04852
Petitioner:
Anton M Kubica
Respondent:
Leanna Lundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Martin v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
William Martin
Respondent:
Nethanjah Breitenbach and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gato v. State of Nevada
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Rene Gato
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corbray v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05432
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC)Patton v. Wasco State Prison
as 1:2024cv00669
Petitioner:
Derrick T. Patton
Respondent:
Wasco State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woodruff #230414 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01375
Petitioner:
Terrence C Woodruff
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
