Cases 41 - 50 of 94,892
Dixon v. State of Montana
as 1:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Joshua Dixon
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gossett v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05433
Petitioner:
Mark J Gossett
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawes v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Robert Dennis Hawes
Respondent:
S. Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Newcomb v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Bryant Patrick Newcomb
Respondent:
S. Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Buchanan v. Gamboa
as 2:2024at00722
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Buchanan
Respondent:
Martin Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. State of Nevada
as 2:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
Arturo Rivera
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cabrera v. The State of Nevada et al
as 2:2024cv01064
Petitioner:
Ivonne Cabrera
Respondent:
The State of Nevada, Nevada Department of Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waldrep #309512 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv01303
Petitioner:
Roger Darryl Waldrep
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00280
Petitioner:
Anthony Ravon Ruffin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fuller v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00483
Petitioner:
Jesse Thomas Fuller
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
