Cases 101 - 110 of 839
Harris v. Ramirez
as 5:2022cv01568
Plaintiff:
Tevin Lee Harris
Defendant:
B. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Gilmore
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Strange et al
as 2:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L Hicks and Ronnie Lee Hicks, II
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Frantz, Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Sr. #190298 v. Shinn, et al
as 2:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
David Shinn, Lori Stickley, Ulises Kiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. San Francisco County Jail #3
as 3:2022cv00965
Plaintiff:
Isriel Isaac Lee Benson
Defendant:
San Francisco County Jail #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Butte Silver Bow County Jail
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Lee Lopez
Defendant:
Butte Silver Bow County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Crosby et al
as 3:2022cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Barkarri Foster
Defendant:
C. Crosby, J. Puente, C. Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs v. Wilmont et al
as 2:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Defendant:
Leon Wilmont, Unknown Couper, Unknown Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin McCullom v. Alameda Sheriff's Department, et al
as 22-15122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN LEE MCCULLOM
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAMEDA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF GREGORY J. AHERN, MARIA MAGOT, Medical Director and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
