Cases 31 - 40 of 141
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Escobar v. Angry Crab Shack Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv01025
Defendant:
Andrew Diamond, Unknown Diamond, Angry Crab Shack Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Escobar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sikes v. Patterson
as 2:2020cv00717
Plaintiff:
Amanda Sikes
Defendant:
Andrew L. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Andrew Sedaghatpour v. Zara USA, Inc., a New York Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv01272
Plaintiff:
Andrew Sedaghatpour
Defendant:
Zara USA, Inc., a New York Corporation, Does 1-100 inclusive and Zara USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyd et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2019cv07646
Petitioner:
Christine Boyd, Marissa Gazcon, Bryson Brown and others
Respondent:
Doordash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Edwin Ryan, Jr. et al v. Chino Valley Independent Fire District
as 5:2019cv01490
Plaintiff:
Keith Stroup, Rick Parpan, Leslie Kast and others
Defendant:
Chino Valley Independent Fire District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stellwagen et al v. Willamette Community Health Solutions
as 6:2019cv00711
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stellwagen and Andrew Hastings
Defendant:
Willamette Community Health Solutions
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Comex Food Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv01821
Defendant:
Andrew Truong, Jan Nguyen, K.C. of Rowland Heights and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Perez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Jason Adams, et al v. City of Baldwin Park, et al
as 2:2019cv00297
Plaintiff:
Warren Agregado, Patricia Dena, Philip Wener and others
Defendant:
City of Baldwin Park and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Abdeljabbar et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2018cv07482
Plaintiff:
Odeh Abdeljabbar, Eder Berganza, Dexter Baldridge II and others
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
