Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Hyde-Rhodes v. Withers et al
as 4:2021cv00335
Plaintiff:
Kim Hyde-Rhodes
Defendant:
Mark Withers, Dave Johnson, John Stosich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re Brandon Sattler
as 2:2021mc00754
Plaintiff:
James Russell, Grant Whitcher and Julie Russell
Defendant:
Brandon Sattler
Grant S. Kim v. Superior Court of California County of Riverside
as 5:2021cv00644
Plaintiff:
Grant S. Kim
Defendant:
Superior Court of California County of Riverside
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Molidor v. Aragon et al.
as 3:2021cv01731
Defendant:
Grant Colfax and Thomas J. Aragon
Plaintiff:
David Lawrence Molidor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00108
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shupe et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00561
Plaintiff:
Grant T. Shupe, Janice K. Shupe, Chad B. Shupe and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture and United States of America
Kristy Fontes et al v. Fluent Inc, et al
as 2:2020cv06452
Plaintiff:
Bryan Hilliard, Kristy Fontes, Steven Hoffer and others
Defendant:
Fluent Inc and Does 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fluent, Inc et al v. Kristy Fontes et al
as 5:2020cv01160
Defendant:
Nace Reynolds, Diedre Love, Lashana Grant and others
Plaintiff:
Fluent LLC, Fluent Inc, Fluent, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Frederick v. Garcia et al
as 2:2020cv00929
Defendant:
Jacqueline Randall, Olga Garcia Martinez, M Grant Randall and others
Plaintiff:
Mary B Frederick
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710
Beyer et al v. Porch.com Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Matthew Erlichman, GoSmith Inc., Darwin Widjaja and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gilbert, Grant Gary, Michael Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
