Cases 71 - 80 of 180
Stross v. DapperToast, LLC
as 3:2019cv01798
Defendant:
DapperToast, LLC
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bayonne Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501
Inhale, Inc. v. 201 Smoke Shop, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07994
Plaintiff:
Inhale, Inc.
Defendant:
201 Smoke Shop, LLC and Alexander Bittan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Stross v. Smith Rock Masonry Company LLC
as 6:2019cv01394
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Defendant:
Smith Rock Masonry Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Stross v. Lumens Holdco, Inc.
as 2:2019cv01201
Defendant:
Lumens Holdco, Inc. and Lumens Holdco, Inc. Doing business as Lumens.com
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bayonne Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Alexander Wild v. Preventive Pest Control, LLC
as 19-55734
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER WILD, an individual, DBA Alex Wild Photography
Defendant / Appellee:
PREVENTIVE PEST CONTROL, LLC, a New Mexico limited liability company
Wild v. Preventive Pest Control Mesa LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04500
Defendant:
Preventive Pest Control Phoenix LLC, Unknown Parties and Preventive Pest Control Mesa LLC
Plaintiff:
Alexander Wild and Alexander Wild an individual doing business as Alex Wild Photography
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Stross v. Hawkins et al
as 2:2019cv03112
Defendant:
Hawkins & Associates Reality Incorporated, Nancy Hawkins and Hawkins & Associates Realty Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Alexander Bayonne Stross v. CALCAP Lending, LLC
as 2:2019cv04120
Defendant:
CALCAP Lending, LLC
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bayonne Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Stross v. SQFT Studios LLC
as 3:2019cv00659
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Defendant:
SQFT Studios LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Alexander Stross v. Movoto, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03205
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Movoto, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
