Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Montana Medical Association et al v. Knudsen et al
as 9:2021cv00108
Plaintiff:
Montana Medical Association, Five Valleys Urology, PLLC, Providence Health & Services - Montana and others
Defendant:
Austin Knudsen and Laurie Esau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaacson et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
Paul A Isaacson, Eric M Reuss, National Council of Jewish Women (Arizona Section) Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Michael Whiting, Brian McIntyre and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gary Alexander, et al v. United Behavioral Health
as 21-15194
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GARY ALEXANDER, on his own behalf and on behalf of his beneficiary son, Jordan Alexander, CORINNA KLEIN and DAVID HAFFNER, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Intervenor Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DRISCOLL
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS (AHIP), SECRETARY OF LABOR, NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM, et al. and others
David Wit, et al v. United Behavioral Health
as 20-17363
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATASHA WIT, BRANDT PFEIFER, on behalf of the Estate of his deceased wife, Lauralee Pfeifer, CORINNA KLEIN and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
MARY JONES and LINDA TILLITT
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS (AHIP), NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF OPIOID DEPENDENCE, CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, FEDERATION OF AMERICAN HOSPITALS, NATIONA, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Apt. Assn of Greater L.A. v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 20-56251
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES, 1 through 25, inclusive, ERIC GARCETTI, in his official capacity as Mayor of Los Angeles, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APARTMENT ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, INC., DBA Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ALLIANCE OF CALIFORNIANS FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT ACTION and STRATEGIC ACTIONS FOR A JUST ECONOMY
Amicus Curiae:
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF NONPROFIT HOUSING, UNITED TEACHERS LOS ANGELES, UCLA LUSKIN INSTITUTE ON INEQUALITY AND DEMOCRACY, UCLA CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD KNOWLEDGE, PROFESSOR ANANYA ROY AND PROFESSOR PAUL ONG and others
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. Becerra et al
as 3:2020cv01990
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Summer Stephan
Plaintiff:
Neighborhood Market Association, Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Mental and Public Health Organizations
Amicus Curiae:
Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Lung Association, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Creation of a Remedy - Declaration of Rights
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al v. County of San Diego et al
as 3:2020cv01290
Defendant:
Helen N. Robbins-Meyer and County of San Diego
Plaintiff:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Public Health Law Center, African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, American Lung Association and others
Petitioner:
Mental and Public Health Organizations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of California v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 20-16045
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR II, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PRO-LIFE OBSTETRICIANS & GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PEDIATRICIANS, CATHOLIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL CATHOLIC BIOETHICS CENTER, AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CATHOLIC NURSES, USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
