Cases 51 - 60 of 95
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al
as 19-55995
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Washington et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv05210
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, II and others
Plaintiff:
State of Colorado, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Physicians, Washington Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs, Little Lobbyists and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
State of New York, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 19-71982
Petitioner:
STATE OF VERMONT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Respondent:
ANDREW WHEELER, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
State of Alabama et al v. Endo International PLC, et al
as 3:2019cv04157
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceutical Inc., Endo international PLC. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
State of California, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16299
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, RICHARD V. SPENCER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy and others
Amicus Curiae:
TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SABINE DURDEN, DON ROSENBERG, BRIAN McCANN, JUDY ZEITO, MAUREEN MULRONEY, MAUREEN LAQUERRE, DENNIS BIXBY, Angel Families, DUANE MORELY COX and others
State of California et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2019cv03807
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Andrew Wheeler and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201
Sierra Club, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 19-16102
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity, STEVEN TERNER MNUCHIN, in his official capacity, PATRICK SHANAHAN, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB and SOUTHERN BORDER COMMUNITIES COALITION
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF VERMONT, SLSCO LTD. and others
State of Oregon, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-35386
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, PLANNED PARENTHOOD COLUMBIA WILLAMETTE, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DIANE FOLEY, OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Amicus Curiae:
SUSAN B. ANTHONY LIST, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNECOLOGISTS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, CALIFORNIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, AND SOCIETY FOR MATERNAL-FETAL MEDICINE and others
State of Oregon et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 6:2019cv00316
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
