Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant: Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
The United States v. State of Idaho We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff: The United States and United States of America
Defendant: State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant: Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae: New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
James Erickson, et al v. Snap Inc., et al
as 19-80157
Defendant: WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, LLC, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., LUMA SECURITIES, LLC and others
Petitioner: DAVID SPRING, D.D.S., TOM DIBIASE, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, on behalf of New Mexico State Investment Council and others
Plaintiff: SHINU GUPTA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and DAVID STEINBERG
Not Yet Classified: SMILKA MELGOZA, as trustee of the Smilka Melgoza Trust U/A DTD, JAMES ERICKSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, DONALD R. ALLEN and others
Intervenor: WEI C. HSIEH and CHENGHSIN D. HSIEH
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Cancer Fund of America Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00884
Defendant: James Reynolds, II, Cancer Fund of America Incorporated a Delaware corporation doing business as Breast Cancer Financial Assistance Fund, Cancer Support Services Incorporated and others
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, Alabama, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Receiver: Receivership Management Incorporated
Petitioner: First Tennessee Bank NA, Associated Community Services Incorporated and Central Processing Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Zahler v. United States et al
as 2:2012cv03075
Plaintiff: Eric Zahler
Defendant: United States, United States Supreme Court, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Smokestack Lightening Ltd,, et al v. New Mexico State Investment Co, et al
as 10-56436
Plaintiff: SONAM BAKSHI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BAKERS LOCAL NO. 433 PENSION FUND, MINNESOTA BAKERS UNION PENSION FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: NEW MEXICO STATE INVESTMENT COUNCIL, Lead Plaintiff
Objector - Appellant: SMOKESTACK LIGHTENING LTD "MARISCO"
Defendant: HENRY SAMUELI, WILLIAM J. RUEHLE, DAVID A. DULL and others
Defendant - Appellee: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Movant: JUSTIN SHENKAROW, STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO and LECG, LLC
Stmokestack Lightening Ltd, et al v. New Mexico State Investment Co, et al
as 10-56435
Plaintiff: SONAM BAKSHI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BAKERS LOCAL NO. 433 PENSION FUND, MINNESOTA BAKERS UNION PENSION FUND and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: NEW MEXICO STATE INVESTMENT COUNCIL, Lead Plaintiff
Objector - Appellant: SMOKESTACK LIGHTENING LTD "MARISCO"
Defendant: HENRY SAMUELI, WILLIAM J. RUEHLE, DAVID A. DULL and others
Defendant - Appellee: BROADCOM CORPORATION
Movant: JUSTIN SHENKAROW, STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF OHIO and LECG, LLC
United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Hawii, State of Illinois, State of Louisiana, Commonwealth of massachusetts, State of et al v. Eli Lilly & Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv03651
Plaintiff: United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Hawii, State of Illinois, State of Louisiana, Commonwealth of massachusetts, State of and State of Tennessee, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Georgia, State of Indiana, State of Michigan, State of Montana, State of New Hampshire, State of New Mexico, State of New York, S
Defendant: Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Type: Other Statutes None
New Mexico State Investment Co, et al v. Ernst & Young LLP, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-55632
Plaintiff - Appellant: NEW MEXICO STATE INVESTMENT COUNCIL, Lead Plaintiff
Plaintiff: SONAM BAKSHI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, BAKERS LOCAL NO. 433 PENSION FUND, MINNESOTA BAKERS UNION PENSION FUND and others
Defendant - Appellee: ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Defendant: HENRY SAMUELI, WILLIAM J. RUEHLE, BROADCOM CORPORATION and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?