Cases 101 - 110 of 160,595
Hinman v. Gianforte
as 2:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Richard Denver Hinman
Defendant:
Greg Gianforte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crooked Arm v. The City of Hardin et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Elery Royce Crooked Arm
Defendant:
The City of Hardin, Calen Curtin, Donald Babbin, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Scott v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Riles v. City of Fremont et al
as 3:2024cv02986
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Riles
Defendant:
City of Fremont and Christopher Borzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
The Estate of Trevor Loflin et al v. City of Huntington Beach et al
as 8:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Paul Loflin, Jr.
Other:
Estate of Trevor Loflin
Defendant:
Huntington Beach City of and DOES 1 though 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
