Cases 11 - 20 of 27
White, III v. Bryan et al
as 2:2021cv01087
Defendant:
Bob Faulkner, Jennifer Nash, Theresa Wickham and others
Plaintiff:
Toney Anthoney White, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Faulkner v. Lucille Packard Salter Children's Hospital
as 3:2021cv00780
Plaintiff:
Bethann Faulkner
Defendant:
Lucille Packard Salter Children's Hospital
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Moss v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2018cv00428
Defendant:
Romeo Aranus, M Cervas, M. Dante and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mally v. City of Beaverton et al
as 3:2017cv01000
Defendant:
City of Beaverton, John Doe and Eric Faulkner
Plaintiff:
Craig Mally
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joshua Rodriguez v. City of West Covina et al
as 2:2017cv00138
Defendant:
City of West Covina, Corporal Del Haro, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rodriguez
Carlos Miramontes v. City of West Covina et al
as 2:2016cv06093
Defendant:
WCPD Officer K Benitez, City of West Covina, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Miramontes
Dryden v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv01227
Defendant:
E. Anderson, Department of Corrections, Bob Faulkner and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Dryden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yi Shao v. McManis Faulkner, LLP, et al
as 14-17063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant - Appellee:
MCMANIS FAULKNER, LLP, JAMES MCMANIS, CATHERINE BECHTEL and others
Shao v. McManis Faulkner, LLP et al
as 5:2014cv01137
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao
Defendant:
McManis Faulkner, LLP, James McManis, Catherine Bechtel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Yahweh v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2013cv00548
Plaintiff:
Terry Yahweh
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department, James Pina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
