Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT v. Pogue et al
as 1:2018cv00271
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alexander Favor VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Nancy Svetich Pogue, Fannie Owu, Valarie Anelle Roacha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gannon v. McDermed, etc.
as 6:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Gannon
Defendant:
Carolyn McDermed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fox v. Goddard et al
as 2:2011cv00595
Plaintiff:
Joel Fox
Defendant:
Samuel P Goddard, III , Donald Conrad , Todd Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pamela Barnett, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 10-55084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAMELA BARNETT, Captain, ALAN KEYES, Ph. D., Ambassador, RICHARD NORTON BAUERBACH, Lieutenant Colonel and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, MICHELLE L.R. OBAMA, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Secretary of State and others
Wiley Drake, et al v. Barack Obama, et al
as 09-56827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILEY S. DRAKE and MARKHAM ROBINSON
Plaintiff:
ALAN KEYES, Ph. D., Ambassador, PAMELA BARNETT, Captain, RICHARD NORTON BAUERBACH, Lieutenant Colonel and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, MICHELLE L.R. OBAMA, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Secretary of State and others
Wheatstraw, LLC v. Mason et al
as 3:2008cv01176
Plaintiff:
Wheatstraw, LLC
Defendant:
Linda-Darnell Mason, Tammy Delaney, Michael Edward Delaney and others
Intervenor:
Michael-Edward and Tammie-Marie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Michael-Edward et al v. US Bank National Association, N.A. et al
as 3:2008cv01108
Plaintiff:
Michael-Edward and Tammie-Marie
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, N.A., Routh Crabtree Olsen, P.C., Malia Wasson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
