Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, et al
as 4:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 2:2017cv02243
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Safron Hout v. Montana State Department of Ch, et al
as 16-35877
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAFRON HOUT
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES, MONTANA STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER, MONTANA SUPREME COURT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01672
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 3:2016cv01767
Defendant:
Anaconda Family Resource Center, Cal Boyal, Susanne M. Clague and others
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Broom v. Martin et al
as 2:2016cv00758
Plaintiff:
Adedra Broom
Defendant:
Ross R Martin and Unknown Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rutledge v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2007cv04274
Plaintiff:
Zachariah J. Rutledge and Zachariah J. Rutledge
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Michael Potts, Russel L. Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
