Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Michael N. Brown v. Azusa Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv03569
Plaintiff:
Michael N. Brown
Defendant:
Azusa Police Department, Los Angeles County Fire Battalion 16, City of Hope - West Covina Hematology and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
(PS) Sn v. Girish et al
as 2:2022cv01796
Plaintiff:
Sharmila Sn
Defendant:
Bhagya Gariah, Girish Kannalli, M.L. Srinivasa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01724
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Porter et al v. Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health Services et al
as 2:2016cv02949
Defendant:
Chelsea Szklany, Kyle Devine, M.D. Jacob Manjooran and others
Plaintiff:
Clorissa D. Porter and William D. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-35308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv04362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Korsunsky v. SecureMedical Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv01191
Plaintiff:
Joel Korsunsky
Defendant:
SecureMedical Incorporated , John Rao and Cathy T Rao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
