Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Henao et al v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Joseph Henao, Angela Henao and J. Michael Hopper
Defendant:
County of Sacramento, Jennifer Rodriguez, Seleena Ulahannan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Theill v. Kroger et al
as 3:2017cv01722
Defendant:
Attorney J. Michael Alexander, Attorney Richard Alway, Association of Family and Conciliation Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Coral Anika Theill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Education Networks of America, Inc. v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2016cv00379
Plaintiff:
Education Networks of America, Inc.
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Idaho Department of Administration, J. Michael Gwartney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03616
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tony Denunzio v. City of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2013cv06542
Defendant:
Cody Cardana, Cody Cardana, City of Santa Barbara and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Denunzio
Kessack v. Walla Walla County et al
as 2:2013cv05062
Plaintiff:
Erik Kessack
Defendant:
Walla Walla County, J Michael Humphreys, James Romine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albayanira Carcamo v. Superior Court of California, et al
as 12-56312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBAYANIRA CARCAMO
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and J. MICHAEL MCCOY
Albayanira Carcamo v. Superior Court of California County of Riverside et al
as 5:2012cv00903
Plaintiff:
Albayanira Carcamo
Defendant:
J Michael McCoy and Superior Court of California County of Riverside
Alba Yanira Carcamo v. J Michael McCoy
as 2:2012cv03809
Plaintiff:
Alba Yanira Carcamo
Defendant:
J Michael McCoy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
