Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Webb v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv06034
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington, Kitsap County, Chad M Enright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Webb v. State of Washington, et al
as 22-36008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID Q. WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, ROBERT WATSON FERGUSON, Washington State Attorney General, KITSAP COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Not Classified By Court:
JOHN GESE
Webb et al v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2022cv05448
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington, Robert Watson Ferguson, Kitsap County Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Webb v. State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services et al
as 3:2021cv05761
Plaintiff:
David Q Webb
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Kitsap County Government, Chad M Enright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00687
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hunter v. Oroville et al
as 2:2017at00005
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Gene Hunter
Defendant:
City of Oroville, John Scott Nickelson, Shane Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hunter v. City of Oroville et al.
as 2:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Gene Hunter
Defendant:
City of Oroville , John Scott Nickelson , Shane Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Nickelson et al
as 2:2017at00004
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Gene Hunter
Defendant:
John Scott Nickelson, Shane Carpenter, Christopher Nicodemus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
