Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-35105
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Intervenor - Pending: DAVID GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, REX W. TILLERSON, Secretary of State and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF HAWAII
Amicus Curiae - Pending: TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND OTHER BUSINESSES, FRED KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, LAW PROFESSORS AND CLINICIANS and others
State of Hawaii v. Trump Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00050
Defendant: Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff: State of Hawaii, Ismail Elshikh, Muslim Association of Hawaii, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, State of Oregon, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Intervenor: Frederick Banks, Ph.D. Vincent Lucas, Joseph Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
State of Washington, et al., v. Trump., et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00141
Plaintiff: State of Washington , State of Oregon , State of California and others
Defendant: Donald J. Trump , U.S. Department of Homeland Security , United States of America and others
Amicu: Americans United for Separation of Church and State , American Civil Liberties Union of Washington (ACLU) , Service Employees International Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Araceli Rodriguez v. Lonnie Swartz We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-16410
Plaintiff - Appellee: ARACELI RODRIGUEZ, individually and as the surviving mother and personal representative of J.A.
Defendant - Appellant: LONNIE SWARTZ, Agent of U.S. Border Patrol
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PROFESSORS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH and others
Duncan Roy et al v. County of Los Angeles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv09012
Other: Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Amicus Curiae: Law Professors
Plaintiff: Duncan Roy, Christian Michel Varela, Annika Alliksoo and others
Defendant: Leroy D Baca, Alain Martinez-Perez and County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Roche, et al v. AT&T Corp., et al
as 09-16709
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD ROCHE and ALL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: AT&T CORP.
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS
James Joll, et al v. AT&T Corp., et al
as 09-16723
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES JOLL, RAMON GOGGINS, IAN WALKER and others
Defendant - Appellee: AT&T CORP., AT&T INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS
Studs Terkel, et al v. AT&T Corp., et al
as 09-16713
Plaintiff - Appellant: STUDS TERKEL, (now deceased), BARBARA FLYNN CURRIE, DIANE C. GERAGHTY and others
Defendant - Appellee: AT&T CORP., ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO., DBA AT&T Illinois and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS
Darryl Hines, et al v. Verizon Northwest, Inc., et al
as 09-16706
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRYL HINES, ALEX KLABACKA, JANA KLABACJA and others
Defendant - Appellee: VERIZON NORTHWEST, INC., an active Washington corporation, VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., an active Delaware corporation and VERIZON
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS
Joan DuBois, et al v. AT&T Corp., et al
as 09-16690
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOAN DUBOIS, CHRISTOPHER YOWTZ, REBECCA YOWTZ and others
Defendant - Appellee: AT&T CORP., CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS LLC, MCI COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?