Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ivan Law v. Rupert A. Byrdsong
as 2:2021cv01321
Defendant:
Rupert A. Byrdsong
Plaintiff:
Ivan Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisa Douglass v. De Beers Group, UK et al
as 2:2020cv06525
Defendant:
Paris Hilton, Weymouth Clinic Variety, Andrew Frankel and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Douglass and Lisa M Douglass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Browne v. City and County of Honolulu
as 1:2019cv00460
Defendant:
Susan Ballard, Samuel L. Jacso, Doe Officers 1 through 20, Inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Rupert Browne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stringham et al v. Bush et al
as 3:2016cv00960
Defendant:
William Paul Andresen, Lawrence Barnes, Sean Nathanial Beyer and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Edmunds, Lauren Beyer Edmunds, Robert Alan Edmunds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RAC Development, Inc. v. Joseph Rupert
as 8:2015cv01933
Defendant:
DOES and Joseph Rupert
Plaintiff:
RAC Development, Inc.
Morales-Alfonso v. Francisco Enterprises Incorporated et al
as 4:2015cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jorge Morales-Alfonso
Defendant:
Francisco Enterprises Incorporated, Tohono O'odham Swap Meet, Esmeralda Francisco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rupert v. Oliveros et al
as 2:2011cv00773
Defendant:
Judge Hoskiss, Cherele Moss, Betty Bahian Oliveros and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander R. Rupert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00169
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
