Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
ERG Home Health Provider, Inc., et al v. Xavier Becerra et al
as 2:2023cv09074
Petitioner: ERG HOME HEALTH PROVIDER, INC.,, Z&H HOSPICE, INC. dba PINK ROSE HOSPICE and XAVIER BECERRA SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Plaintiff: ERG Home Health Provider, Inc. and Z&H Hospice, Inc.
Defendant: Xavier Becerra and Chiquita Brooks-Lasure
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pamfile v. USA Secretary of Health and Human Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01059
Plaintiff: Catalin Pamfile
Defendant: USA Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lana Marcussen v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 13-15785
Plaintiff - Appellant: LANA E. MARCUSSEN
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services, in her official and personal capacity, THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney Generl of the State of Arizona, in his official and personal capacity, JULIE P. NEWELL, Commissioner, in her official and personal capacity and others
Jim Navarro v. USA, et al
as 12-17586
Plaintiff - Appellant: JIM NAVARRO
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIK K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Secretary of Social Security Administration and others
United States of America The People Et Al, v US Secretary of Health and Human Services Et Al,
as 8:2008cv00034
Plaintiff: United States of America, The People, Et Al and Joseph Gabrill
Defendant: US Secretary of Health and Human Services Et Al, State of California Et Al and Governor of California Et Al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Rosen v. Leavitt et al
as 2:2007cv01686
Plaintiff: Michael Rosen
Defendant: Michael O Leavitt, Secretary of Health and Human Services and Health and Human Services, Department of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?