Cases 1 - 8 of 8
O. L. v. County of Orange, et al
as 23-55258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
O. L., AKA Jane Doe and JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF ORANGE, DON BARNES, WILLIAM BAKER and others
Jane Doe v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2020cv00322
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
County of Orange, Does 1-10, inclusive, William Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adela Hernandez et al v. Luke South et al
as 2:2019cv04445
Plaintiff:
Adela Hernandez, Imelda Ramirez, Diana Ramirez and others
Defendant:
County of Orange, DOES 1 through 50, inclusive., Orange County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pepper Draper et al v State of Arizona et al
as 8:2012cv01602
Plaintiff:
Grant Abbot, William O Abright, Justin Ahrens and others
Defendant:
State of Indiana, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Smith v. Napolitano et al
as 2:2011cv01138
Defendant:
Robin Archambault, William Baker, Jerom C Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Smith, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Michael Potts, et al v. Brian Stiger, et al
as 10-17633
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL L. POTTS and THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY
Defendant - Appellant:
BRIAN STIGER, in his official capacity as Director, California Department of Consumer Affairs, RICHARD DECUIR, Executive Officer, California Dental Board, JOHN BETTINGER, D.D.S., President and others
Potts, et al v. Hamilton, et al
as 2:2003cv00348
Plaintiff:
Michael L Potts and American Academy of Implant Dentistry
Defendant:
Kathleen Hamilton, Cynthia Gatlin, Alan Kaye and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry
Intervenor:
Lawrence Addleson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
