Cases 101 - 110 of 231,329
Lucero Jr. v. Blaney
as 5:2024cv02865
Plaintiff:
Albert Benjamin Lucero Jr.
Defendant:
John Blaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purdue #113333 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Jacob J Purdue
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, M Shiro, C Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Napa State Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv02943
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital and Fernando Cortez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey #361996 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01118
Petitioner:
Leon Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02945
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Facebook
as 4:2024cv02935
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Facebook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grewal #338078 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01117
Petitioner:
Avtar Singh Grewal
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Abdullah v. Santoro, et al.
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, K. Mixon, M. Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bousley v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Antoine Bousley
Defendant:
Garcia and Director of Nursing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dillard v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Dillard
Defendant:
Collado Scarborough, Sarah Angol, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
