Cases 11 - 20 of 1,453
Sivak v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
SGT. Ramirez, Aaron Fodge, R. Findeisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riggs v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Daniel Riggs
Defendant:
Ramirez, Baker and Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sergio Ramirez v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2024cv00863
Petitioner:
Sergio Ramirez
Respondent:
Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(HC) Ramirez v. CDCR Secretary
as 1:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Saul Miranda Ramirez
Respondent:
CDCR Secretary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Alexa Ramirez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Carmen Ramirez
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leon #206401 v. Arizona State Prison Complex Perryville et al
as 2:2023cv02717
Plaintiff:
Rosalinda L Leon
Defendant:
Arizona State Prison Complex Perryville, Harvey Shemldley, Weinstanley Plumb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Pratt et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parkerson v. O.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2023cv01865
Plaintiff:
William J. Parkerson
Defendant:
O.D.O.C., Whelan, C. Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brunskill v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv06380
Plaintiff:
Dylan Richey Brunskill
Defendant:
K. Mitchell, Lt. Ramirez, Lt. Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
