Cases 11 - 20 of 222
Daniel Govind v. State of California et al
as 5:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
Daniel Govind
Defendant:
State of California, California Institution For Men, James S. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felton Love, Jr. v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, KATHLEEN ALLISON, TRACY JOHNSON and others
(PC) Love v. Macomber et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Felton Love, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Kathleen Allison, Tracy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felton Love, Jr. v. Rick Hill, et al
as 23-15312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELTON LOVE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK M. HILL, J. HECKMAN, D. HARRIS and others
Mejia v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00107
Petitioner:
Ivan Mejia
Respondent:
Unknown Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mejia v. Alyson et al
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Jesse Mejia
Defendant:
Ryan Alyson, Elke Jackson, Alex Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia v. Pliler et al
as 1:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Denise M.K. Mejia
Defendant:
Warden Pliler, Chief Physician Paycar, Unit Manager Sylvester and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Preciado v. Eastern State Hospital
as 1:2022cv03188
Petitioner:
Emanuel Mejia Preciado
Respondent:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Preciado v. Eastern State Hospital
as 1:2022cv03187
Petitioner:
Emanuel Mejia Preciado
Respondent:
Eastern State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mejia v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00495
Petitioner:
Denise Mejia
Respondent:
Warden Estelle Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
