Cases 11 - 20 of 262
Shaw v. USA
as 2:2023cv00006
Petitioner:
Buddy Shaw, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Richard Evans v. J. Ourique, et al
as 22-16905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
J. OURIQUE, Associate Warden, J. COLLINS, P. BRIGHTWELL and others
Ronald Robinson v. General Manager of CALPIA, et al
as 22-56103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MANAGER OF CALPIA, individual ; and official capacity, J. GASTELO, Warden: individual ; and official capacity, FRANK SHAW, Administrator of CALPIA at California Men's Colony, individual; and official capacity and others
Gregory Brown v. Richard Morgan, et al
as 22-35884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD L. MORGAN, BERNARD WARNER, SCOTT FRAKES and others
Shaw v. Clandenin
as 5:2022cv06139
Petitioner:
Timothy Shaw
Respondent:
Stephanie Clandenin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)Shaw v. Clandenin
as 1:2022cv01291
Petitioner:
Timothy Shaw
Respondent:
Stephanie Clandenin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Wilson v. Hampson et al
as 1:2022cv00897
Plaintiff:
David W. Wilson
Defendant:
Velma Hampson, Willard, A. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Casarez-Cardoso v. Roberts et al
as 2:2022cv00756
Plaintiff:
Miguel Casarez-Cardoso
Defendant:
Dr. Warren Roberts, J. Bugher, E. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnny Shaw v. Bloomfield
as 5:2022cv00669
Petitioner:
Johnny Shaw
Respondent:
Bloomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Shaw et al
as 4:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Sanda E Lopez and Sandra E Lopez
Defendant:
Brian Shaw, Unknown Parties, Heston Silbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
