Cases 21 - 30 of 402
Willoughby v. Sherwood et al
as 2:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Thomas Willoughby
Defendant:
Kyle Sherwood, SeaTac Federal Detention Center and Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christenson v. Warren et al
as 4:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
John J Christenson
Defendant:
Alice Schroder Warren, Jennifer Davie, Able Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Miramontes v. Meyers
as 1:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Paul Miramontes
Defendant:
Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Mitchum v. Honea et al
as 2:2022cv02313
Plaintiff:
Michael Ernest Mitchum, Jr
Defendant:
Kory Honea, Hal Brooks, Al Saracini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miramontes v. Meyers
as 1:2023at00113
Plaintiff:
Miramontes
Defendant:
Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon Johnson, et al
as 22-56152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN W. DUNIGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYBON C. JOHNSON, Warden, CSPA LA COUNTY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Dunigan v. Raybon C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv07216
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Thomas M James
Defendant:
David Shinn, Diana Labar, Jillian Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyer v. Wren et al
as 6:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jon Meyer
Defendant:
Daniel J. Wren, Katherine Simple and Marion County Risk Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
