Cases 21 - 30 of 9,669
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 2:2024cv00982
Plaintiff:
Shane Donavan Brooks
Defendant:
Roman, Chet Rigney, Tasheena Sandoval Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Perryman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
David Perryman
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeff McCumber, Patrick Cavello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Rigney et al
as 2:2024cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
Curtis Rigney, T. Phelps, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harrison v. Birtwell et al
as 2:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Michael David Harrison
Defendant:
Birtwell, Moore, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Four in One
as 4:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Four in One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Lettieri v. Facebook
as 4:2024cv02935
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Facebook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Libuser v. Grodman et al
as 3:2024cv08091
Plaintiff:
David Sutherland Libuser
Defendant:
Howard Grodman and Angela Eberhardt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Coker v. Cambell
as 1:2024cv00566
Petitioner:
Charles David Coker
Respondent:
T. Cambell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cortez Jr v. Trejo Jr et al
as 1:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Armando Cortez Jr
Defendant:
Glen Trejo Jr, Officer Ceja, Granger Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
