Cases 21 - 30 of 387
Chesterman v. Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 4:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Defendant:
Board of Pardons and Parole, Department of Corrections and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend
as 4:2023cv06102
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Gary Townsend
Defendant:
Warden Oak Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chesterman v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00117
Petitioner:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Chesterman v. START Program et al
as 6:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lloyd Chesterman
Defendant:
START Program, Department of Corrections and Montana State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fudge v. Bennett et al
as 2:2019cv01102
Defendant:
J. Olive, J. Carjal, C. Ford and others
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacklin v. Cochise, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00316
Petitioner:
Roman Lloyd Jacklin
Respondent:
Cochise, County of and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Lloyd v. Ochoa
as 1:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Adrian Juan Lloyd
Defendant:
Ochoa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tatarakis v. Merced County et al
as 1:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
Mathew Tatarakis
Defendant:
Merced County, Nicole A. Silveira, Vernon H. Wranke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Lloyd
as 4:2023cv03446
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
