Cases 21 - 30 of 6,689
Waide #067117 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2024cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Waide, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Party, NaphCare and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green #164269 v. Moreno et al
as 2:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Green
Defendant:
Unknown Moreno, Ryan Thornell, Corizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erskine v. US. Government Agencies
as 6:2024cv00778
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Erskine
Respondent:
US. Government Agencies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Collins v. Veach et al
as 2:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Collins
Defendant:
Veach, C. York, J. Marfil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waide #067117 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2024cv01097
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Waide, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Arizona Diagnostic Radiology
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Lucas v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Petitioner:
David Lee Lucas
Respondent:
Placer County Superior Court and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lee v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02811
Petitioner:
Webster Lee
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kinnamon v. Thich
as 3:2024cv02784
Plaintiff:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Defendant:
Thich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne v. Vincent et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Jack Lee Osborne
Defendant:
Capt. Vincent, Deputy Fittings, Deputy Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
