Cases 31 - 40 of 5,196
Elghembriu v. Doe
as 3:2024cv02768
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembriu
Defendant:
Teacher Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Lipsey Jr. v. Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv03716
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr
Defendant:
Lancaster State Prison Warden Lundy, Captain Z. Soisuvarn, Lieutenant A. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roderick Washington et al v. Fern et al
as 2:2024cv03723
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Shen Jay Fern, Jackie Lacey, Jose I. Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
N.A. v. U.S.A.
as 4:2024cv02561
Plaintiff:
N.A.
Defendant:
U.S.A. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Josue Israel Sanchez
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. Ruby et al
as 6:2024cv00713
Plaintiff:
Sidney V. Newton
Defendant:
Officer Ruby, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Das v. Medvin, et al
as 3:2024cv02477
Plaintiff:
Damodar Chandra Das
Defendant:
John Doe and Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Hapo Community Credit Union et al
as 2:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Paul Dawson
Defendant:
Hapo Community Credit Union and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Ronald Haynes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Kauwe v. Nicole Caceres et al
as 8:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kauwe
Defendant:
Nicole Caceres, Stacey Berardino, Clayton Chau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
