Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Adams v. Old Pinal County Jail
as 2:2010cv01069
Plaintiff:
Pitt Earl Adams
Defendant:
Old Pinal County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Attorney General for the State of California et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of California, Department of Corrections Director, Ken Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Attorney General State of California et al
as 1:2009cv01556
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
Attorney General State of California, Ken Clark, L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olds v. Yates
as 5:2009cv03258
Petitioner:
Tod Olds
Respondent:
James A. Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mirna Pineda Bahena v. Old Republic Default Management Services et al
as 8:2008cv01400
Plaintiff:
Mirna Pineda Bahena and Mirna Pineda Bahena
Defendant:
Old Republic Default Management Services, Saxon Mortgage Services Inc, Saxon Mortgage Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Olds v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv05612
Petitioner:
Darrel C Olds, Jr
Respondent:
Washington State Department of Corrections and Washington State ISRB
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allara v. Old Folsom State Prison et al
as 2:2008cv02051
Petitioner:
Anthony Allara
Respondent:
Old Folsom State Prison and Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Allara v. Old Folsom State Prison et al
as 3:2008cv03027
Petitioner:
Anthony Allara
Respondent:
Old Folsom State Prison and Sacramento County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Old Person v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv00001
Petitioner:
Randall Scott Old Person
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
