Cases 31 - 40 of 716
Beckwith v. Mason et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rae Beckwith
Defendant:
Dep. Mason, Dep. D. Jung, Dep. Babock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Lee Haughton v. Ramos et al
as 2:2023cv06216
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lee Haughton
Defendant:
Lt. H. Ramos, Sgt. Tillotson, Sgt. A. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05659
Plaintiff:
Shanell K Duncan
Defendant:
Pierce County, Alvin R Allen, Maria Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Ramos
as 4:2023cv03588
Plaintiff:
Correy Mitchell
Defendant:
Dr. Roxanne Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Cadena et al
as 2:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
Marcellus D K Jackson
Defendant:
N Cadena, J Navarette, Albert Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamwright v. Camacho et al
as 2:2023cv01265
Plaintiff:
Kenyon O Hamwright
Defendant:
A Camacho, Unknown Riviera, Unknown Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Rosa Guadalupe Ramos
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02996
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(HC) Ramos v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
as 1:2023cv00922
Petitioner:
Manuel Ramos
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC)Trammel v. Ramos et al
as 1:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Demarion Trammel
Defendant:
A. Ramos, Zomora Ortiz and Ortiz Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
