Cases 41 - 50 of 453
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2021cv05311
Plaintiff:
Daryl Rogers
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Fithian, Lystad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Miller v. Commissioner of the State of California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Gordon, Commissioner of the State of California Department of Corrections and Warden of Kern County Lerdo Pre-Trial
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00203
Defendant:
Mr.- Scally, James Dzurenda, V. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Duston Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Bettencourt v. Spencer
as 2:2020cv02459
Petitioner:
Gary Ray Bettencourt
Respondent:
Gordon Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Mccoy-Gordon v. Gray et al
as 1:2020cv01728
Defendant:
Rodriguez, Silva, Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Demarrea Mccoy-Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Santa Rita Jail Medical Staff
as 5:2020cv08515
Plaintiff:
Terry Gordon
Defendant:
Santa Rita Jail Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gordon v. Unknown Party, et al
as 20-17296
Defendant / Appellee:
ENGLAND, Health Service Administrator, Tucson Arizona, BEHLE, Lieutenant, AUSP Thomson, Illinois, UNKNOWN PARTY, Medical Doctor, Coleman Florida and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Jarrod Gordon v. Riverside Transit Agency et al
as 5:2020cv02424
Defendant:
Stephine Sirls, Jane Doe 1, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meador v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv08326
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Warden of Salinas Valley State Prison and CDCR Departmental Review Board
Plaintiff:
Gordon D. Meador
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baca v. Gordon et al
as 2:2020cv01951
Defendant:
Office of General Inspectors, Michael Gordon, J Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Rabago Baca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
