Cases 51 - 60 of 456
Owens v. Corpus et al
as 3:2022cv06220
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Oliver Owens
Defendant:
Sheriff Corpus, Sargeant Hoffman, Deputy Elabed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Global Tel*Link Corp. et al
as 3:2022cv06170
Plaintiff:
Loureece Stone Clark
Defendant:
Global Tel*Link Corp. and Brian D. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Garcia
as 5:2022cv06049
Plaintiff:
Anthony W. Oliver
Defendant:
R. Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Santander Consumer USA Incorporated et al
as 4:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Incorporated, Unknown Parties, Experian Information Solutions Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
James v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Thomas M James
Defendant:
David Shinn, Diana Labar, Jillian Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Fudge v. Bret Bennett, et al
as 22-35723
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES FUDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET BENNETT, NANCY ARMSTRONG, JEREMY BEAUMONT and others
Douglas Oliver Kelly v. Ronald Broomfield
as 2:2022cv06460
Petitioner:
Douglas Oliver Kelly
Respondent:
Ronald Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
James Fudge v. Bret Bennett, et al
as 22-35708
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CHARLES FUDGE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRET BENNETT, NANCY ARMSTRONG, JEREMY BEAUMONT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05076
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
