Cases 51 - 60 of 1,613
Sanchez v. Martinez et al
as 3:2023cv01561
Petitioner:
Nakunta Sanchez
Respondent:
Kelly Martinez and The Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ndandu v. Alvarado et al
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Tresor Maleka Ndandu
Defendant:
Alvarado, Almager, A. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Revels v. Santa Rita Jail et al
as 4:2023cv04404
Plaintiff:
Tyler Revels
Defendant:
Santa Rita Jail, Deputy Holly, Deputy S. Cheung and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons #321572 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01620
Plaintiff:
Antoine Lavelle Simmons
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Swayne, Unknown Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsel v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Eric Townsel
Defendant:
Kenneth Sawyer, David Kenney, Sandra Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01446
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DePonte v. Bierman et al
as 3:2023cv03813
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Mirna Bierman, E. Espinoza, Correctional Officer A. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01448
Plaintiff:
Tianna Sanchez
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Scottsdale, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Dianne Barker
Defendant:
Scottsdale, City of, Scottsdale Police Department, Alan Rodbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08199
Plaintiff:
Michael I Sanchez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
