Cases 71 - 80 of 1,434
Garnica-Melgoza v. Fortney et al
as 2:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Daniel Garnica-Melgoza
Defendant:
Adam Fortney, Evan Twept, Grant Kendall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Bonta, et al.
as 4:2022cv01726
Plaintiff:
Burl Evans
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Cecily Gray, Contra Costa County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Briseno v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Irene Briseno
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Nicolo Solarino, Francisco Santa Maria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Black
as 3:2022cv01723
Petitioner:
Burl Evans
Respondent:
Cindy Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Corona, III v. Ducey, et al
as 2:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
James M Corona, III
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, Unknown Party, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Evans v. R. Milam, et al
as 22-15351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD A. EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
R. MILAM, Plant Operations at SATF, LEFFMAN and S. SHERMAN, Warden at SATF
(PC) Evans v. Diaz et al
as 1:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
David Arkeen Evans
Defendant:
Ernesto Diaz, John Martin, Christian Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Evans v. Diaz et al
as 2:2022cv00425
Plaintiff:
David Evans and David Arkeen Evans
Defendant:
Ernesto Diaz, John Martin, Christian Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Sr. #190298 v. Shinn, et al
as 2:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
David Shinn, Lori Stickley, Ulises Kiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tripati v. Carter et al
as 2:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Paul Edward Carter, Unknown Carter, Michael Evan Gottfried and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
