Cases 71 - 80 of 110
Maisano v. Robertson et al
as 4:2011cv00643
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
David Webere Robertson, Arizona, State of, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geren v. Oneill et al
as 1:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Geren
Defendant:
Jay Oneill, Brent Linne Weber and Park County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Lopez et al
as 1:2011cv00630
Plaintiff:
Synrico Rodgers
Defendant:
R. Lopez, T. A. Weber, R. Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. Lopez et al
as 2:2011cv00821
Plaintiff:
Synrico Rodgers
Defendant:
R. Lopez, T. A. Weber, R. Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Apker et al
as 4:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
Terry Michael Miller
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Christopher J Lamb, Julia Heard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weber v. Cortez Masto
as 3:2011cv00104
Respondent:
E. K. McDaniel and Nevada Attorney General
Unknown:
Catherine Cortez-Masto and Michael Pescetta
Petitioner:
Timmy John Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald Glass v. A. Scribner, et al
as 11-15109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD GLASS
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, K. Anderson C. Espinoza M. Randolph F. Fuhldort F. Lieutenant M. Seifert W. Villarreal L. wood J. Yates D. Ortiz D. Zavala C/O Henderson Weber L. Brock J. Buckley V. Castillo D. Means B. Steeter, D. BAILY, D. BEEBE and others
Habig v. McAllister et al
as 2:2010cv02022
Plaintiff:
David Habig
Defendant:
W. McAllister, M. Sabin, J. Bick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Lee Weber v. C. Stowell et al
as 2:2010cv02020
Defendant:
Coillet, Coillot, Smoot and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Weber
Maisano v. Robertson et al
as 4:2010cv00155
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
David Webere Robertson, Unknown Market, Charles Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
