Cases 81 - 90 of 503
(PC) Murphy v. Pierce et al
as 2:2021cv01789
Plaintiff:
Monrell D. Murphy
Defendant:
C. Pierce, J. Lopez and J. Lebeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shuler v. Mansfield et al
as 3:2021cv05713
Plaintiff:
Joshua Issiah Shuler
Defendant:
Lisa Mansfield, Meagan M Foley, Edmund Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Madden
as 3:2021cv01600
Plaintiff:
Alfred Murphy
Defendant:
Raymond Madden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Antonin Guzman v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2021cv01425
Plaintiff:
Antonin Guzman
Defendant:
County of Orange, Alfredo Rasch, Unknown Defendant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy-Richardson v. Shinn et al
as 3:2021cv06138
Petitioner:
Ismael A. Murphy-Richardson
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Superior Court of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy-Richardson v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv01385
Plaintiff:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murphy v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2021cv01004
Plaintiff:
Thomas Robert Murphy
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Northwest Regional Reentry Center, Oregon District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00973
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hebrard v. Miller et al
as 3:2021cv00918
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, J. Varvska, Dr. Gulick and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Thomas Hebrard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy-Richardson v. Maricopa County Superior Court
as 2:2021cv00954
Petitioner:
Ismael Antonio Murphy Richardson and Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Respondent:
Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County Superior Court, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
