Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nemeth v. Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) et al
as 6:2024cv01355
Defendant:
Alex Wagner, Holly Burghardt, Ofc Michael Praska and others
Plaintiff:
Patricia Nemeth and Estate of Jesse Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris
as 5:2024cv01293
Plaintiff:
Marvin Harris
Defendant:
John Doe, Acting Warden Bryan D. Phillips, Hollandberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Metcalf v. Aguazo et al
as 1:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Denzell Metcalf
Defendant:
Jose Aguazo, Albert Gibbons, Tai Ban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banning v. Warden Hutchings et al
as 2:2022cv00885
Petitioner:
David Michael Banning
Respondent:
Warden Hutchings, The Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Hutchings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price #135896 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv02322
Plaintiff:
Michael Price
Defendant:
Unknown Banning, Charles L Ryan and Corizon Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Jeremiah v. Mark Nooth, et al
as 18-35547
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN A. JEREMIAH
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, Superintendent, SRCI, BRAD CAIN, Superintendent SRCI, MCNITT, Officer and others
Kendrick v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv00024
Plaintiff:
Harvey Kendrick
Defendant:
Paul Penzone , Richard Van Blarcum , Unknown Ban Blarcum and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Teton v. Duncan et al
as 1:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Rydon C Teton
Defendant:
Ute Indian Tribe, United States of America, Sho-Ban Tribes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louise Aguilar v. Riverside County Sheriff et al
as 5:2012cv00595
Defendant:
Abrego, Banning Jail, Garrison and others
Plaintiff:
Louise Aguilar
Lee, et al. v. Wilkins, et al.
as 1:2008cv00568
Plaintiff:
Phia Lee, Voua Yang, Alladin Pangilinan and others
Defendant:
M. Hodges Wilkins, R.H. Trimble, C. Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
