Cases 1 - 10 of 12
(PC) Daniel v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Brant Q. Daniel and Brant Q Daniel
Defendant:
Jeffery Lynch, S. Ramirez, K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brant et al
as 3:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Williams
Defendant:
Brant, Aguinaga, Iwatsu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Williams v. Brant et al
as 2:2022cv01293
Plaintiff:
Willie Royce Williams
Defendant:
F. Brant, CMF-Office of Grievances, J. Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston v. Curry et al
as 9:2018cv00082
Plaintiff:
Cody Johnston
Defendant:
Chuck Curry, Geno Cook, John Dynneson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sigler v. Brant et al
as 4:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
Omar S Sigler
Defendant:
Unknown Brant and Sierra Vista, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davids v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2013cv02654
Plaintiff:
Brant Gregory Davids
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Towers Jail and Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mangiaracina #303182 v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv00709
Plaintiff:
Nick Mangiaracina
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio , Unknown Hansen, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Shawn Damon v. Bruce McDermott, et al
as 12-35304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN T. DAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE MCDERMOTT, JOHN PARKER, STEVE BULLOCK and others
Damon v. McDermott et al
as 4:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Shawn T. Damon
Defendant:
Bruce McDermott, John Parker, Steve Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Mahoney et al
as 9:2009cv00033
Petitioner:
Gerald Foster
Respondent:
Mike Mahoney and Brant Light
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
